Why do monitors cost more than TVs?

While visiting a tv shop you may have seen price tags showing the prices of tv and monitors. You may have noted that the prices of monitors are higher than the TVs. Although monitors are smaller in size yet costly than TVs. Moreover, they provide low resolution as well.

Why do you get a TV at a reasonable price but for the same resolution monitor you are asked to pay more? The answer is as simple as the question. There are other features than resolution. Monitors have a higher refresh rate, responsive panels, and response time. Moreover, they have better image accuracy.

TVs may look attractive and bigger than monitors. But there are huge differences in their working purposes, and it is one of the reasons for the higher price.

Why do monitors cost more than TVs

 However, we will discuss these features in detail. So, let’s get started:

Responsive Screens:

Monitors are built for computers. Therefore, the features should be of higher quality as compared to TVs. The screens should be more responsive which means that they can interpret instructions and show the results quickly.

In seconds the commands should be executed by a good monitor. Although, new versions of TVs can execute instructions in a shorter period. But still, monitors are way ahead. If we talk about speed TVs can not compete with monitors. The reason lies in the purpose.

Both are constructed for different purposes. TVs are made for entertainment while monitors are a part of computers to do more high-end jobs.

Let’s see the terms related to responsive screens:

Refresh rate Monitors vs TVs:

The refresh rate of monitors is higher than TVs. Refresh rate means how many times the display can change per second. For example, say your monitor has a 60 Hz response rate. It means your monitor can change the display 60 times in a second. To get a smooth output, a higher refresh rate plays a vital role.

The best monitors have 144 Hz, 170 Hz, and 240Hz or more refresh rates. These refresh rates are available in the $400 or $500 range. However, for a TV with a 144Hz refresh rate, you will have to spend almost $1000.

Resolution Monitors vs TVs:

The resolution of TVs is less than monitors. However, comparing resolutions is not the only way to conclude. Many monitors only have a 2K resolution but have higher response rates. It is costly to get a monitor with a higher resolution as well as a higher response rate and refresh rate.

Response Time Monitors vs TVs:

Monitors have generally a higher response time as compared to TVs. Response time is related to the viewing experience. Faster response time means a better viewing experience. For gaming purposes, monitors are better as they have lower input lag.

Generally, for gaming, monitors have a response time of 1ms. TVs are best for watching movies and news etc. However, OLED TVs are an exception. They have a greater response time.

Further features:

Screen Colors:

As TVs and monitors are built for different purposes. Therefore, we can face color accuracy problems.  TVs are meant for entertainment purposes but the display colors they show are most of the time filtered. And no doubt these filtered images look attractive and clear.

However, if you use a TV screen for graphic design purposes it will not be a good choice. For graphic designing and image and video editing, monitors are the best choice. These sorts of creative works can be done perfectly on monitors. That is why monitors are costly as compared to TVs.

Screen tearing:

In displays, there is an effect that shows the tearing of videos and images. The reason is the high frame rate. The FPS is greater than the refresh rate causing screen tearing. To prevent the tearing effect monitors have free sync or G sync feature.

Contrast and VA panels:

To have the best picture quality contrast plays an important role. VA panel is used in monitors to enhance the contrast of images. It increases the contrast 3 to 5 times as compared to other contrast panels. Moreover, it also enhances color saturation.

Warranty and life span:

The latest smart TVs can last for 3 to 4 years. However, monitors have a longer life span as well as a warranty. That is why TVs are cheaper than monitors.

Final word:

The lower input lag of monitors, high refresh rate, and response time make it more expensive than a tv. You can use the tv for gaming purposes using HDMI ports. However, due to the lower response rate playing competitive games is not an excellent choice.

FAQs:

Are monitors more expensive than TVs?

Yes, monitors are more expensive than TVs. One of the key reasons is marketing. It is known that monitors are a long-term investment due to the high quality and the higher-end jobs they perform.

Why computer monitors are expensive than TVs?

Computer monitors have features that are better than this. For example, the refresh rate and response time of monitors are higher than TVs. It also depends on the purpose. Computer monitors are built to do high-tech jobs while TVs are just for entertainment.

Why are monitors so expensive?

Monitors are expensive due to the function they perform with high technology. The features of monitors play a crucial role in their pricing. Moreover, the warranty is another key factor for its high price.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.